http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2006/11/astroid-6000-the-review-part-ii/ SolidWorks Tips, Tricks and Partner Reviews Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2006/11/astroid-6000-the-review-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Clem Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:50:36 +0000 http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=26#comment-13 I would of thought that for someone who was involved with the original spaceball product, more time would have been invested in the overall ergonomics of the Astroid. Why the symmetry and the tiny buttons? For they're first generation product I think they are headed in the right direction though. I would of thought that for someone who was involved with the original spaceball product, more time would have been invested in the overall ergonomics of the Astroid. Why the symmetry and the tiny buttons? For they’re first generation product I think they are headed in the right direction though.

]]> http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2006/11/astroid-6000-the-review-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1248 Clem Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:50:00 +0000 http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=26#comment-1248 I would of thought that for someone who was involved with the original spaceball product, more time would have been invested in the overall ergonomics of the Astroid. Why the symmetry and the tiny buttons? For they're first generation product I think they are headed in the right direction though. I would of thought that for someone who was involved with the original spaceball product, more time would have been invested in the overall ergonomics of the Astroid. Why the symmetry and the tiny buttons? For they’re first generation product I think they are headed in the right direction though.

]]>