<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanning &#8211; Is it me or the scanner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2007/07/scanning-is-it-me-or-the-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2007/07/scanning-is-it-me-or-the-scanner/</link>
	<description>SolidWorks Tips, Tricks and Partner Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2007/07/scanning-is-it-me-or-the-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=95#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I wondered how this would pan out for you. I had to scan a shiny high heel shoe and get some of the interior detail, so I cut the shoe apart and painted it black - flat black rustoleum. I never understood that old Rolling Stones song until then.
Something I&#039;ve done when scanning things that are relatively flat was to just break down and use a simple flat bed scanner. It doesn&#039;t capture the depth, but it gets the x-y very clearly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I wondered how this would pan out for you. I had to scan a shiny high heel shoe and get some of the interior detail, so I cut the shoe apart and painted it black &#8211; flat black rustoleum. I never understood that old Rolling Stones song until then.<br />
Something I&#8217;ve done when scanning things that are relatively flat was to just break down and use a simple flat bed scanner. It doesn&#8217;t capture the depth, but it gets the x-y very clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2007/07/scanning-is-it-me-or-the-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=95#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I wondered how this would pan out for you. I had to scan a shiny high heel shoe and get some of the interior detail, so I cut the shoe apart and painted it black - flat black rustoleum. I never understood that old Rolling Stones song until then.
Something I&#039;ve done when scanning things that are relatively flat was to just break down and use a simple flat bed scanner. It doesn&#039;t capture the depth, but it gets the x-y very clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I wondered how this would pan out for you. I had to scan a shiny high heel shoe and get some of the interior detail, so I cut the shoe apart and painted it black &#8211; flat black rustoleum. I never understood that old Rolling Stones song until then.<br />
Something I&#8217;ve done when scanning things that are relatively flat was to just break down and use a simple flat bed scanner. It doesn&#8217;t capture the depth, but it gets the x-y very clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

