<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/</link>
	<description>SolidWorks Tips, Tricks and Partner Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hauber</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I am having the same problem with Office 2007 apps crashing all the time due to ntdll.dll running Vista 64 &amp; SolidWorks 2009 &amp; PDM works.  Any fixes?
*I haven&#039;t heard of anything, yet, David. However, I&#039;ve upgraded to &#039;09 and haven&#039;t had any problems so far. I&#039;ve even been able to start using my SpacePilot again without any crashes.*
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having the same problem with Office 2007 apps crashing all the time due to ntdll.dll running Vista 64 &#038; SolidWorks 2009 &#038; PDM works.  Any fixes?<br />
*I haven&#8217;t heard of anything, yet, David. However, I&#8217;ve upgraded to &#8217;09 and haven&#8217;t had any problems so far. I&#8217;ve even been able to start using my SpacePilot again without any crashes.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hauber</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>I am having the same problem with Office 2007 apps crashing all the time due to ntdll.dll running Vista 64 &amp; SolidWorks 2009 &amp; PDM works.  Any fixes?
*I haven&#039;t heard of anything, yet, David. However, I&#039;ve upgraded to &#039;09 and haven&#039;t had any problems so far. I&#039;ve even been able to start using my SpacePilot again without any crashes.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having the same problem with Office 2007 apps crashing all the time due to ntdll.dll running Vista 64 &amp; SolidWorks 2009 &amp; PDM works.  Any fixes?<br />
*I haven&#8217;t heard of anything, yet, David. However, I&#8217;ve upgraded to &#8217;09 and haven&#8217;t had any problems so far. I&#8217;ve even been able to start using my SpacePilot again without any crashes.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mirisola</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mirisola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Brian - My top level assembly has 4 sub-assemblies and each of those is comprised of sub-assemblies that are comprised of sub-assemblies. For this project, it&#039;s what makes sense. It allows for control of equipment by floor or area. The bodies is a result of imported data and the fact that I&#039;m working with a group of people who are inexperienced with 3D modelling.
Jason - I don&#039;t remember the dll file, not that it would matter. SolidWorks is still working on figuring out the &quot;why&quot; of it all.
Devon - Workgroup.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; My top level assembly has 4 sub-assemblies and each of those is comprised of sub-assemblies that are comprised of sub-assemblies. For this project, it&#8217;s what makes sense. It allows for control of equipment by floor or area. The bodies is a result of imported data and the fact that I&#8217;m working with a group of people who are inexperienced with 3D modelling.<br />
Jason &#8211; I don&#8217;t remember the dll file, not that it would matter. SolidWorks is still working on figuring out the &#8220;why&#8221; of it all.<br />
Devon &#8211; Workgroup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mirisola</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mirisola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>Brian - My top level assembly has 4 sub-assemblies and each of those is comprised of sub-assemblies that are comprised of sub-assemblies. For this project, it&#039;s what makes sense. It allows for control of equipment by floor or area. The bodies is a result of imported data and the fact that I&#039;m working with a group of people who are inexperienced with 3D modelling.
Jason - I don&#039;t remember the dll file, not that it would matter. SolidWorks is still working on figuring out the &quot;why&quot; of it all.
Devon - Workgroup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; My top level assembly has 4 sub-assemblies and each of those is comprised of sub-assemblies that are comprised of sub-assemblies. For this project, it&#8217;s what makes sense. It allows for control of equipment by floor or area. The bodies is a result of imported data and the fact that I&#8217;m working with a group of people who are inexperienced with 3D modelling.<br />
Jason &#8211; I don&#8217;t remember the dll file, not that it would matter. SolidWorks is still working on figuring out the &#8220;why&#8221; of it all.<br />
Devon &#8211; Workgroup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon T. Sowell</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon T. Sowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeff-
WorkGroup or Enterprise PDM?
Devon
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeff-<br />
WorkGroup or Enterprise PDM?<br />
Devon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon T. Sowell</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon T. Sowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeff-
WorkGroup or Enterprise PDM?
Devon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeff-<br />
WorkGroup or Enterprise PDM?<br />
Devon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Jeff.
Do you know what the dll file is that Windows x64 is having problems with?  I am running Vista x64 and I am having a problem with ntdll.dll crashing Office 2007 all the time.  Let me know if you know any other details.
Thanks
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Jeff.<br />
Do you know what the dll file is that Windows x64 is having problems with?  I am running Vista x64 and I am having a problem with ntdll.dll crashing Office 2007 all the time.  Let me know if you know any other details.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Jeff.
Do you know what the dll file is that Windows x64 is having problems with?  I am running Vista x64 and I am having a problem with ntdll.dll crashing Office 2007 all the time.  Let me know if you know any other details.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Jeff.<br />
Do you know what the dll file is that Windows x64 is having problems with?  I am running Vista x64 and I am having a problem with ntdll.dll crashing Office 2007 all the time.  Let me know if you know any other details.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Titus</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the same issue with one of my clients (XP x64 and PDMWorks instability#.  It usually manifests a crash of the assembly is large #2k+ components).
Their top level assembly is 20K+ components.  Ultimately they were forced into checking in subassemblies.
I submitted this and got the same response of &quot;Turn off PDMWorks whenever possible&quot;.  Needless to say the client is not happy.
Managing a top level assemb;y with over 4K is going to be challenging.  If they&#039;ve got over 10K bodies that may impact performance / stability.
You may want to look at breaking up that top level assembly into more sub-assemblies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the same issue with one of my clients (XP x64 and PDMWorks instability#.  It usually manifests a crash of the assembly is large #2k+ components).<br />
Their top level assembly is 20K+ components.  Ultimately they were forced into checking in subassemblies.<br />
I submitted this and got the same response of &#8220;Turn off PDMWorks whenever possible&#8221;.  Needless to say the client is not happy.<br />
Managing a top level assemb;y with over 4K is going to be challenging.  If they&#8217;ve got over 10K bodies that may impact performance / stability.<br />
You may want to look at breaking up that top level assembly into more sub-assemblies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Titus</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffmirisola.com/2008/12/project-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsblog.solidworksheard.com/?p=174#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the same issue with one of my clients (XP x64 and PDMWorks instability#.  It usually manifests a crash of the assembly is large #2k+ components).
Their top level assembly is 20K+ components.  Ultimately they were forced into checking in subassemblies.
I submitted this and got the same response of &quot;Turn off PDMWorks whenever possible&quot;.  Needless to say the client is not happy.
Managing a top level assemb;y with over 4K is going to be challenging.  If they&#039;ve got over 10K bodies that may impact performance / stability.
You may want to look at breaking up that top level assembly into more sub-assemblies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the same issue with one of my clients (XP x64 and PDMWorks instability#.  It usually manifests a crash of the assembly is large #2k+ components).<br />
Their top level assembly is 20K+ components.  Ultimately they were forced into checking in subassemblies.<br />
I submitted this and got the same response of &#8220;Turn off PDMWorks whenever possible&#8221;.  Needless to say the client is not happy.<br />
Managing a top level assemb;y with over 4K is going to be challenging.  If they&#8217;ve got over 10K bodies that may impact performance / stability.<br />
You may want to look at breaking up that top level assembly into more sub-assemblies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

