ePDM – Is it worth it?

When I started in my new position I found it odd that they were using ePDM. As far as I was concerned ePDM was for large design groups, not 1-2 designers. In the back of my mind I started thinking about how we’d cleanly transition from ePDM to PDMWorks when the subscription was up. I’d be saving the company ~$1000 per year, or would I?

When I first began using it, I found ePDM to be a bit cumbersome and not very user friendly. While this may have had something to do with being a PDMWorks for years and having zero exposure to ePDM, I still think it could be a bit more inviting. That being said, I’m starting to warm up to it. Unlike PDMWorks, ePDM lets you check files in and out without bumping the revision, which is awesome (yes, I know about “working copy”). I like how it keeps track of each iteration, even allowing you to put in notes so you can keep track of what you were doing. In the fluid environment in which I work, this is a HUGE plus, especially where I suffer from CRS. When I check in whatever I was working on, I type in a few notes to remind me of where I was when I last left off. If only my predecessors had used this feature…

More upsides that I’ve sort of seen are the ability to easily export to different file formats. While all of our suppliers are good with PDF’s, most can’t handle native SolidWorks files. From what I’ve seen, I can simply set up tasks to export different file types right from ePDM. What I don’t know, but will find out, is can I decide where to save files to? What sort of parameters can I set? It’s the answers to these questions, along with a couple of other bits, that will ultimately help me decide whether to keep ePDM when our subscription is up. That will have to wait for another post.

If you have thoughts, I’d love to hear them.

Be Sociable, Share!
    October 27, 2012 · Posted in Software Review, SolidWorks Community  
        

    Comments

    • http://www.cadfanatic.com Brian

      Workgroup is severely limited when it comes to revisoning. It incorrectly calls versions “revisions”, and as you noted, it ends up rolling a revision if you are using it that way. Working copy is dangerous in my opinion, and I don’t use it. I use Workgroup solely as a versioning tool and manually add revisions to the versions that are to be released (pretty much the way EPDM works).

      EPDM does versioning/revisioning right – you can assign a revision label to a version that is ready to be released.

    • http://twitter.com/JeffSweeney Jeff Sweeney

      The convert task does not have to be fully automatic. If you wish you could have it ask you for the pdf’s file name and location.

    SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline